<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Incredible Shrinking Man Remake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-264215</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-264215</guid>
		<description>I agree. This is a remake that NEEDS to be serious and needs a serious actor: if it get&#039;s both of those it could actually be brilliant. I love the idea of them remaking Shrinking Man because I loved it so much and to watch it again from a modern angle would be beautiful. Which is why I&#039;m pretty upset Eddie Murphy is in it. He&#039;s just too slapstick and I couldn&#039;t take him seriously. Pity, guess I&#039;ll just have to wait for the Fantastic Voyage remake to come out instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is a remake that NEEDS to be serious and needs a serious actor: if it get&#8217;s both of those it could actually be brilliant. I love the idea of them remaking Shrinking Man because I loved it so much and to watch it again from a modern angle would be beautiful. Which is why I&#8217;m pretty upset Eddie Murphy is in it. He&#8217;s just too slapstick and I couldn&#8217;t take him seriously. Pity, guess I&#8217;ll just have to wait for the Fantastic Voyage remake to come out instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-235996</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-235996</guid>
		<description>First of all, let me say I&#039;m a huge fan of both the book and the original movie. There are 2 reasons why I&#039;d like to see a serious remake of it: 
1. So the new generations get to know this classic (a very underrated movie, that deserves more attention).
2. So the new version could include several &quot;details&quot; that appear in the book, and were left out in the original movie, that could give it a deeper, even darker meaning: his sexual frustrations, his lost of authority (to his daughter), and a lot of themes that could provide more layers into the story. These details were maybe too strong for the 50&#039;s, but could work these days, with a smart script.
 Yes, &quot;shrinking&quot; could be kind of ridiculous in  these modern times, leaving modern writers no other vehicle than a &quot;magic spell&quot;, but the important thing about The Shrinking Man is not &quot;how it happened&quot;. That&#039;s just a device. What&#039;s important is the serious and psicological, existentialist journey of the main character. I&#039;d like to see it played by a more serious actor, maybe someone like Russel Crowe, or Christian Bale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, let me say I&#8217;m a huge fan of both the book and the original movie. There are 2 reasons why I&#8217;d like to see a serious remake of it:<br />
1. So the new generations get to know this classic (a very underrated movie, that deserves more attention).<br />
2. So the new version could include several &#8220;details&#8221; that appear in the book, and were left out in the original movie, that could give it a deeper, even darker meaning: his sexual frustrations, his lost of authority (to his daughter), and a lot of themes that could provide more layers into the story. These details were maybe too strong for the 50&#8242;s, but could work these days, with a smart script.<br />
 Yes, &#8220;shrinking&#8221; could be kind of ridiculous in  these modern times, leaving modern writers no other vehicle than a &#8220;magic spell&#8221;, but the important thing about The Shrinking Man is not &#8220;how it happened&#8221;. That&#8217;s just a device. What&#8217;s important is the serious and psicological, existentialist journey of the main character. I&#8217;d like to see it played by a more serious actor, maybe someone like Russel Crowe, or Christian Bale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-234512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-234512</guid>
		<description>Eddie Murphy? Couldn&#039;t they have tried this with a fresh, young actor at least? And not a freakin comedy? And not in Las Vegas? And not virtually everything about it now? I actually really want to see this movie remaked (we haven&#039;t had a shrinking movie since the 80s) but can&#039;t they just get it right, it&#039;s not that difficult if you have half an understanding of cult classics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie Murphy? Couldn&#8217;t they have tried this with a fresh, young actor at least? And not a freakin comedy? And not in Las Vegas? And not virtually everything about it now? I actually really want to see this movie remaked (we haven&#8217;t had a shrinking movie since the 80s) but can&#8217;t they just get it right, it&#8217;s not that difficult if you have half an understanding of cult classics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gee</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131611</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131611</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what i was going to say Godfather.

But he did make Norbit which was Nutty Professor in a different wrapper and people saw it.  I&#039;ll be honest; i don&#039;t like Eddie Murphy.  I haven&#039;t for a long long  time and i have given up on him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what i was going to say Godfather.</p>
<p>But he did make Norbit which was Nutty Professor in a different wrapper and people saw it.  I&#8217;ll be honest; i don&#8217;t like Eddie Murphy.  I haven&#8217;t for a long long  time and i have given up on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonSalon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131599</link>
		<dc:creator>RonSalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131599</guid>
		<description>Ugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131590</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131590</guid>
		<description>You lost me with &quot;Eddie Murphy attached to star&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lost me with &#8220;Eddie Murphy attached to star&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sideshow Collectibles Freak</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131569</link>
		<dc:creator>Sideshow Collectibles Freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131569</guid>
		<description>Like many of the remakes that we&#039;re seeing today, the original movie is excellent.  I watched it in a film class called &quot;Heroes and Monsters in the Movies&quot; in college and was pleasantly surprised.  One of the things that makes it great is that it&#039;s a serious film, not a comedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many of the remakes that we&#8217;re seeing today, the original movie is excellent.  I watched it in a film class called &#8220;Heroes and Monsters in the Movies&#8221; in college and was pleasantly surprised.  One of the things that makes it great is that it&#8217;s a serious film, not a comedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GODFATHER</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131555</link>
		<dc:creator>GODFATHER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/the-incredible-shrinking-man-remake#comment-131555</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this movie already coming out, only he&#039;s a shrunken alien? With Eddie Murphy, is there really a difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this movie already coming out, only he&#8217;s a shrunken alien? With Eddie Murphy, is there really a difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

