<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ayelet Zurer cast in Angels and Demons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lay</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132570</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132570</guid>
		<description>davinci was the better book (see every best seller list) hopefully A&amp;D will be the better movie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>davinci was the better book (see every best seller list) hopefully A&amp;D will be the better movie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roguepirate</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132522</link>
		<dc:creator>Roguepirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132522</guid>
		<description>I loved the book Da Vinci Code but here was the problem with adapting the book into a movie. Da Vinci Code dealt a lot with historical references and explaining how those references linked to whatever they were trying to figure out at the time. This works really well in a book because you&#039;re finding out more about whats going on similar to when you&#039;re reading what a character is thinking. In a movie, this does not work well, in a movie the scene will go from story to lecture and that&#039;s where Da Vinci Code went wrong. There&#039;s a scene where Hanks and McKellen were discussing how the grail is Mary Magdalene and it felt like i was watching History Channel on the big screen. This might not be a problem that the book makes a bad movie and could have just been an adaptation problem. If Demons is going to succeed they&#039;re going to need to do a way better job at adapting the book than previously done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the book Da Vinci Code but here was the problem with adapting the book into a movie. Da Vinci Code dealt a lot with historical references and explaining how those references linked to whatever they were trying to figure out at the time. This works really well in a book because you&#8217;re finding out more about whats going on similar to when you&#8217;re reading what a character is thinking. In a movie, this does not work well, in a movie the scene will go from story to lecture and that&#8217;s where Da Vinci Code went wrong. There&#8217;s a scene where Hanks and McKellen were discussing how the grail is Mary Magdalene and it felt like i was watching History Channel on the big screen. This might not be a problem that the book makes a bad movie and could have just been an adaptation problem. If Demons is going to succeed they&#8217;re going to need to do a way better job at adapting the book than previously done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbakid2000</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132518</link>
		<dc:creator>nbakid2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132518</guid>
		<description>I loved the book (Da Vinci Code) myself (even if the source and the material presented as fact in the book WAS bullshit) but yeah, the movie was atrocious.

I wouldn&#039;t make any great effort to see Angels and Demons if it&#039;s done by the same group of people...hand it off to someone else who can do something with it.

Angels and Demons IS a really good book and I&#039;d be interested in seeing a movie IF (and ONLY IF) they got a new team behind it. And made it good. Because with a new team and it still being crap, screw it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the book (Da Vinci Code) myself (even if the source and the material presented as fact in the book WAS bullshit) but yeah, the movie was atrocious.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t make any great effort to see Angels and Demons if it&#8217;s done by the same group of people&#8230;hand it off to someone else who can do something with it.</p>
<p>Angels and Demons IS a really good book and I&#8217;d be interested in seeing a movie IF (and ONLY IF) they got a new team behind it. And made it good. Because with a new team and it still being crap, screw it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132498</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/ayelet-zurer-cast-in-angels-and-demons#comment-132498</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The DaVinci Code was such a critically acclaimed book...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Umm...the book wasn&#039;t exactly &lt;i&gt;acclaimed&lt;/i&gt; by critics. I think the word you&#039;re looking for is &quot;disdained.&quot;

Your point about books with large followings being difficult to translate to movies stands, of course, but in this case the source quality wasn&#039;t really all that great to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The DaVinci Code was such a critically acclaimed book&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Umm&#8230;the book wasn&#8217;t exactly <i>acclaimed</i> by critics. I think the word you&#8217;re looking for is &#8220;disdained.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your point about books with large followings being difficult to translate to movies stands, of course, but in this case the source quality wasn&#8217;t really all that great to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

