<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Directors Guild Announces 2007 Nominees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114741</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114741</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know how you can disagree that he&#039;s ruined ten minutes of discovery for me.
I don&#039;t know what &quot;every review&quot; says about THERE WILL BE BLOOD because I have been avoiding them. This was an article about some award show. Which made me feel kind of ambushed.
As for avoiding the internet until I see the film. Well, I agree you go to these movie news sites at your own peril and I do accept a certain amount of the blame. However the film&#039;s been screen for critics since at least August, it&#039;s January and the movie hasn&#039;t even opened in my city. Am I really expected to &quot;avoid the internet&quot; for six months? An alternate solution is John could just not put spoilers for film in tangentally related articles. Especially for films that have not opened yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know how you can disagree that he&#8217;s ruined ten minutes of discovery for me.<br />
I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;every review&#8221; says about THERE WILL BE BLOOD because I have been avoiding them. This was an article about some award show. Which made me feel kind of ambushed.<br />
As for avoiding the internet until I see the film. Well, I agree you go to these movie news sites at your own peril and I do accept a certain amount of the blame. However the film&#8217;s been screen for critics since at least August, it&#8217;s January and the movie hasn&#8217;t even opened in my city. Am I really expected to &#8220;avoid the internet&#8221; for six months? An alternate solution is John could just not put spoilers for film in tangentally related articles. Especially for films that have not opened yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Ocasek</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114654</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric Ocasek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114654</guid>
		<description>John didn&#039;t ruin anything. If that&#039;s spoiling a film for you, then I suggest you avoid the internet until seeing the film. Every review, every article I&#039;ve read for the THERE WILL BE BLOOD remarks on how incredible the opening of the film is. But forget about the opening, the whole film is amazing....I hope I didn&#039;t ruin it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John didn&#8217;t ruin anything. If that&#8217;s spoiling a film for you, then I suggest you avoid the internet until seeing the film. Every review, every article I&#8217;ve read for the THERE WILL BE BLOOD remarks on how incredible the opening of the film is. But forget about the opening, the whole film is amazing&#8230;.I hope I didn&#8217;t ruin it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crackpotpress</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114612</link>
		<dc:creator>Crackpotpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114612</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree on Diving Bell. I saw it a few months ago and still can&#039;t shake it. One of those rare flicks I find myself still thinking about long after I have seen it.

I think Michael Clayton is WAY overrated ... like when everyone went crazy for Syrianna a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree on Diving Bell. I saw it a few months ago and still can&#8217;t shake it. One of those rare flicks I find myself still thinking about long after I have seen it.</p>
<p>I think Michael Clayton is WAY overrated &#8230; like when everyone went crazy for Syrianna a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gruff</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114594</link>
		<dc:creator>Gruff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114594</guid>
		<description>Where the fuck is Andrew Dominik for the Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the fuck is Andrew Dominik for the Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114593</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/01/directors-guild-announces-2007-nominees#comment-114593</guid>
		<description>@&quot;There isn’t a word of dialog for about the first 10 minutes of the movie… it’s amazing&quot;

I consider that a spoiler. You&#039;ve robbed me of ten minutes of discovery for a film I&#039;ve been looking forward to for two years and hasn&#039;t opened in my market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@&#8221;There isn’t a word of dialog for about the first 10 minutes of the movie… it’s amazing&#8221;</p>
<p>I consider that a spoiler. You&#8217;ve robbed me of ten minutes of discovery for a film I&#8217;ve been looking forward to for two years and hasn&#8217;t opened in my market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

