<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walk Hard takes in a Weak $4.1m</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Doodles</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112612</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Doodles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112612</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I am wrong....but does his cranium look BIG in that poster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I am wrong&#8230;.but does his cranium look BIG in that poster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112587</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112587</guid>
		<description>Walk Hard was funny and entertaining and very good. Reilly was great and so was his voice.  Also have seen Juno (great), Atonement (great), the Savages (very good), No country for Old Men (great), Before the Devil Knows You&#039;re Dead (good), Sweeney Todd (hated it because of the music), and Charlie Wilson&#039;s War (mediocre at best)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walk Hard was funny and entertaining and very good. Reilly was great and so was his voice.  Also have seen Juno (great), Atonement (great), the Savages (very good), No country for Old Men (great), Before the Devil Knows You&#8217;re Dead (good), Sweeney Todd (hated it because of the music), and Charlie Wilson&#8217;s War (mediocre at best)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfie</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112556</link>
		<dc:creator>alfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 09:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112556</guid>
		<description>rodney..i see what you mean.

i have read on a few other sites people using that argument &quot;oh it doesn&#039;t count as a real apatow film because&quot; 

but that is only because it has &quot;bombed&quot;

if this had been a hit the apatow disciples would be crowing about the golden streak continuing...

as for the argument that reilly isn&#039;t a draw....well seth rogan was hardly what i would call a draw when knocked up came out.....

&quot;quick everyone lets go and see that movie starring one of the guys who wasn;t steve carrell in 40 year old virgin&quot;

superbad did fine and those 2 guys were hardly what I would call draws....

this has nothing to do with reilly or apatow...it was just an idea that didn&#039;t capture enough peoples attentions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rodney..i see what you mean.</p>
<p>i have read on a few other sites people using that argument &#8220;oh it doesn&#8217;t count as a real apatow film because&#8221; </p>
<p>but that is only because it has &#8220;bombed&#8221;</p>
<p>if this had been a hit the apatow disciples would be crowing about the golden streak continuing&#8230;</p>
<p>as for the argument that reilly isn&#8217;t a draw&#8230;.well seth rogan was hardly what i would call a draw when knocked up came out&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8220;quick everyone lets go and see that movie starring one of the guys who wasn;t steve carrell in 40 year old virgin&#8221;</p>
<p>superbad did fine and those 2 guys were hardly what I would call draws&#8230;.</p>
<p>this has nothing to do with reilly or apatow&#8230;it was just an idea that didn&#8217;t capture enough peoples attentions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helloyou</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112530</link>
		<dc:creator>helloyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 03:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112530</guid>
		<description>Ya I blame bad release timing and majority of people having shitty senses of humor.  How the hell does this movie do worse than say...Epic movie?  Then people on here were saying how funny that new Adam Sandler movie looks.  OMFG seriously?  &quot;Wow&quot; is all I could say to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya I blame bad release timing and majority of people having shitty senses of humor.  How the hell does this movie do worse than say&#8230;Epic movie?  Then people on here were saying how funny that new Adam Sandler movie looks.  OMFG seriously?  &#8220;Wow&#8221; is all I could say to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjon86</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112525</link>
		<dc:creator>bjon86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112525</guid>
		<description>that sucks. this movie was hilarious! but when I told one of my friends that I was goin out to see it this weekend (which I did) he said &quot;it&#039;s out already???&quot; maybe they had bad marketing, I mean that was just one of my friends, but I&#039;d like to think that ppl didn&#039;t see it because they didn&#039;t know it was out rather than not seeing it because they had no interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that sucks. this movie was hilarious! but when I told one of my friends that I was goin out to see it this weekend (which I did) he said &#8220;it&#8217;s out already???&#8221; maybe they had bad marketing, I mean that was just one of my friends, but I&#8217;d like to think that ppl didn&#8217;t see it because they didn&#8217;t know it was out rather than not seeing it because they had no interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112509</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112509</guid>
		<description>I thought the trailers were funny. The movie made me laugh all alone in an empty theater. Reilley has a really offbeat sense of humor that just speaks to me. At first glance the movie is really broad but there&#039;s all these weird and very nuanced quirks that make me laugh.

If anything Reilley rubbed off on Farrell hence Taledega Knight&#039;s weird sense of humor. If anything the undoing of Walkhard is the lack of a strong supporting cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the trailers were funny. The movie made me laugh all alone in an empty theater. Reilley has a really offbeat sense of humor that just speaks to me. At first glance the movie is really broad but there&#8217;s all these weird and very nuanced quirks that make me laugh.</p>
<p>If anything Reilley rubbed off on Farrell hence Taledega Knight&#8217;s weird sense of humor. If anything the undoing of Walkhard is the lack of a strong supporting cast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris (the real one)</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112505</link>
		<dc:creator>chris (the real one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112505</guid>
		<description>lol at the tim and eric show.....steve bruel is funny as shit, hes gold in that role.....

but i think the fact the movie didnt make a lot of money was the marketing....everybody i know didnt see it because they didnt think the trailers were good at all.....but after the review here and i few others ive read i might just give it a shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol at the tim and eric show&#8230;..steve bruel is funny as shit, hes gold in that role&#8230;..</p>
<p>but i think the fact the movie didnt make a lot of money was the marketing&#8230;.everybody i know didnt see it because they didnt think the trailers were good at all&#8230;..but after the review here and i few others ive read i might just give it a shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Roe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112502</link>
		<dc:creator>E Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112502</guid>
		<description>I saw the movie and lmao. It is imaginative, funny and a little raunchy. John C. plays the part very well and has a killer voice. The best parts of the movie would never get past the censors so I guess that limited the trailers.

Go see it and then come back and comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the movie and lmao. It is imaginative, funny and a little raunchy. John C. plays the part very well and has a killer voice. The best parts of the movie would never get past the censors so I guess that limited the trailers.</p>
<p>Go see it and then come back and comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112501</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112501</guid>
		<description>Alfie, I was suggesting that this movie is less like those other core hits that Apatow is better known for recently. 

I never claimed this was not his movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alfie, I was suggesting that this movie is less like those other core hits that Apatow is better known for recently. </p>
<p>I never claimed this was not his movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112500</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/12/walk-hard-takes-in-a-weak-41m#comment-112500</guid>
		<description>Reily is not a draw, and to be honest, the commercials looked dumb as hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reily is not a draw, and to be honest, the commercials looked dumb as hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

