Comments on: Louis Leterrier Discusses The Hulk

By: Garry

Garry — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:55:54 +0000

Because it just seems silly to me to put 150 Million dollars into a movie such as this and only put out 90 Million on, theatrically. Also, Is it possible to do an Extended version for the regular DVD release, maybe put the movie on the first disc and The special footage on the 2?

By: Garry

Garry — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:51:20 +0000

Hi Mr. Leterrier. I don’t know if you check this website or if it’s just a fansite. Im a fan of your movies, especially Unleashed, But I’ve heard rumors the Theatrical version of The Incredible Hulk, has been cut and edited considerably short compared to yours and Edwards take on it. Let me tell you that I will go see The Incredible Hulk. I’m looking forward to it, but I would have prefered The longer version. The one claiming to be nearly 3 hours long. I know realistically no studio would allow such a long cut with a film their trying to revamp and make money off of, But they should’ve considered a cut at least 2 hours and 20 min.
I’ve also heard rumor that there is over 70 minutes of footage, you plan on putting on the Blue Ray DVD’s. Is that footage actually in a extended version or just Deleted Scenes, I would prefer the Extended version all the way. If not, What will it take for you to put together a extended version with that footage in it, Because

By: Rafa1215

Rafa1215 — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:31:33 +0000

As long as Bruce Banner doesn’t hate his father in this movie then I’m on board with this movie.

By: jordan

jordan — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:11:49 +0000

I hope this work over the last year i have bin disapointed with malvel. We all know how spider-man 3 turned out x-men 3 i didnet think worked as a finale though i kinda liked it my relly complat was it was way to short. i have my fingers crost for the new hulk movie iron man and the dark knight and i hope they all work out from what i read the ideas are good for these movies.

By: Henrik

Henrik — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:27:53 +0000

Well Hulk IS the threat. He is not necessarily a protagonist, since Hulk is pretty unrelatable. I know this is a comic book movie and people want the hero and villain to fight, but treating Hulk as the villain to Bruce Banner was the way to go. Instead of that, now we get CGI-creatures fighting, which everybody seem to agree was the worst part of the first Hulk movie? But I guess that’s forgotten now…

By: Kevin C

Kevin C — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:24:00 +0000

I thought Ang Lees Hulk was okay. I was upset that Bana wasnt coming back, I thought he was great, but when Norton came on board I think they actually upgraded there.

I think that because of Nortons involvement and Leterriers’ penchant for action they can strike a good balance in this film and hopefully a franchise.

By: #007#

#007# — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:11:22 +0000

“I didn’t feel in Ang Lee’s ‘Hulk’ that there was any threat.”

While I too liked Ang Lee’s take, I expected some serious threat and on that it failed to deliver. So hearing this, it seem moving in the right direction.