<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Raimi Meeting With Sony Execs About Spider-Man 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWP</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57404</link>
		<dc:creator>JWP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57404</guid>
		<description>Okay...S3 was not the best movie in that francise, but it was by no means a horrible or waste of time movie.  The movie still had a decent plot and great action sequences.  I will go on to say that Transformers was a much better movie and one that I had little expectations for too --- was pleasantly surprised by the humor throughout it to go along with the great visuals of the robots and action.....along with including possibly the super hot Megan Fox who looked fantastic all sweaty!

I think you&#039;re being a little too harsh John by referring to S3 as &quot;a giant pile of shit&quot;.  I have now tried watching Superman Returns several times on cable as of late and that may possibly be one of the worst superhero movies ever made. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230;S3 was not the best movie in that francise, but it was by no means a horrible or waste of time movie.  The movie still had a decent plot and great action sequences.  I will go on to say that Transformers was a much better movie and one that I had little expectations for too &#8212; was pleasantly surprised by the humor throughout it to go along with the great visuals of the robots and action&#8230;..along with including possibly the super hot Megan Fox who looked fantastic all sweaty!</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re being a little too harsh John by referring to S3 as &#8220;a giant pile of shit&#8221;.  I have now tried watching Superman Returns several times on cable as of late and that may possibly be one of the worst superhero movies ever made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57403</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57403</guid>
		<description>&quot;The big difference between SM3 and Transformers is ENTERTAINMENT.&quot;

Spiderman 3 has better action scenes, entertaining effects, is well shot and well acted. Transformers is the most boring movie I&#039;ve seen in years.  Michael Bay cant edit his effects scenes into an entertaning sequence, and when the robots are not on screen we have unentertaing unfunny scenes that go nowhere.  if you think that Peter Parker being a hep cat isnt funny, but the comic relief in Transformers is, then we are just nowhere near the same page.

&quot;Awesome action, great humor, iconic characters and huge bang for your buck entertainment.&quot;
The only way to consider any of the characters &#039;iconic&#039; is because they were iconic going in already.  There is no personality to any characte rin that film whatsoever, save maybe Sam, who was an asshole, and his parents, who were just goofy and annoying.

Transformers is bar none the worst film of 2007, and there is no good long defense of it besides &quot;i can ignore 2 hours of shit for 30 minutes of mediocre action&quot; - Transformers has been given a free pass for so many flaws whilst SPiderman 3 was raked over the coals over the most minor details.

If you want to call the theater response as evidence of greatness consider I saw Scary Movie in the theaters and the crowd went crazy for it. that doesnt mean they&#039;re right. it just means theres a shitload of wrong thinkers in one place.  I mean, if we want to call on authories, all my friends are Transformers fans, and gearheads. in fact one of them DRAWS for the Transformers comics, and they certainly didnt walk away with the same reaction you did.  But I wouldnt use them as my best case against the film. The best case against the film is onscreen with Michael Bays shitty direction, casting, and editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The big difference between SM3 and Transformers is ENTERTAINMENT.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spiderman 3 has better action scenes, entertaining effects, is well shot and well acted. Transformers is the most boring movie I&#8217;ve seen in years.  Michael Bay cant edit his effects scenes into an entertaning sequence, and when the robots are not on screen we have unentertaing unfunny scenes that go nowhere.  if you think that Peter Parker being a hep cat isnt funny, but the comic relief in Transformers is, then we are just nowhere near the same page.</p>
<p>&#8220;Awesome action, great humor, iconic characters and huge bang for your buck entertainment.&#8221;<br />
The only way to consider any of the characters &#8216;iconic&#8217; is because they were iconic going in already.  There is no personality to any characte rin that film whatsoever, save maybe Sam, who was an asshole, and his parents, who were just goofy and annoying.</p>
<p>Transformers is bar none the worst film of 2007, and there is no good long defense of it besides &#8220;i can ignore 2 hours of shit for 30 minutes of mediocre action&#8221; &#8211; Transformers has been given a free pass for so many flaws whilst SPiderman 3 was raked over the coals over the most minor details.</p>
<p>If you want to call the theater response as evidence of greatness consider I saw Scary Movie in the theaters and the crowd went crazy for it. that doesnt mean they&#8217;re right. it just means theres a shitload of wrong thinkers in one place.  I mean, if we want to call on authories, all my friends are Transformers fans, and gearheads. in fact one of them DRAWS for the Transformers comics, and they certainly didnt walk away with the same reaction you did.  But I wouldnt use them as my best case against the film. The best case against the film is onscreen with Michael Bays shitty direction, casting, and editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven C</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57402</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57402</guid>
		<description>If I was Sony, I wouldn&#039;t let Sam Raimi anywhere near Spiderman 4 after how fucking terrible Spiderman 3 was. I think that 3 shows us that Raimi should just leave the franchise and Sony will have to pray that someone else can save the Spiderman name before its too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was Sony, I wouldn&#8217;t let Sam Raimi anywhere near Spiderman 4 after how fucking terrible Spiderman 3 was. I think that 3 shows us that Raimi should just leave the franchise and Sony will have to pray that someone else can save the Spiderman name before its too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butter On Popcorn</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57401</link>
		<dc:creator>Butter On Popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57401</guid>
		<description>I think Sam Raimi is much like Paul Verhoeven.  They both have a cheese factor quality to their directing that they add to all their movies.  However this cheese factor does work in every film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #3b0000;">
<p>I think Sam Raimi is much like Paul Verhoeven.  They both have a cheese factor quality to their directing that they add to all their movies.  However this cheese factor does work in every film.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricci</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry I have little to no love for this guy, how can someone go from great b movies to the steaming pile of crap that is the spiderman series - hes overrated and way way out of his league, he needs to take a step back and realise, he aint all that, and in my opinion has done spiderman no justice whatsoever.

Peter jackson from brain dead to lotr worked
raimi from ED to spiderman is a failure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry I have little to no love for this guy, how can someone go from great b movies to the steaming pile of crap that is the spiderman series &#8211; hes overrated and way way out of his league, he needs to take a step back and realise, he aint all that, and in my opinion has done spiderman no justice whatsoever.</p>
<p>Peter jackson from brain dead to lotr worked<br />
raimi from ED to spiderman is a failure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMac</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57399</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57399</guid>
		<description>Raimi said that he would do another one if they had the right story. (BBC Radio 5 Live a month or three ago while promoting SM3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raimi said that he would do another one if they had the right story. (BBC Radio 5 Live a month or three ago while promoting SM3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cenobyte21</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57398</link>
		<dc:creator>cenobyte21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57398</guid>
		<description>Honestly at this point, i don&#039;t care. Really. I lost faith in the movies after the during and after the second film. Raimi will raise my eyebrow when he does something other than Spiderman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly at this point, i don&#8217;t care. Really. I lost faith in the movies after the during and after the second film. Raimi will raise my eyebrow when he does something other than Spiderman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Jig-A-Lot</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57397</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Jig-A-Lot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57397</guid>
		<description>comparing SM3 to TF is ridiculous. if you kids are gonna compare Transformers to any Spiderfilm,make it a comparison to the original.

it was easy for Bay to get TF right as there was no previous live-action giant robot film to compare it to. 
let&#039;s see how well a franchise TF is by the time it reaches installment number 3.

SM3 sucked a lot of ass to a lot of people due to the fact that it followed on from the bar-raising SM2. Batman Begins came close to touching that bar but not quite. we&#039;ll see how Nolan does with the Dark Knight as his follow on before we make comparisons to Raimi&#039;s first two SM outings.

personally i would rather Raimi move on from SM if he continues to get interference from the suits like he did on 3. there was to be no Gwen or Eddie had Raimi had HIS way. he did what he could under the circumstances. it&#039;s no secret Raimi is a spiderfoe classicist.
i heard nobody complaining about Doc Ock or the Green Goblin. or even about the awesome Sandman FX. if Sam&#039;s way wasnt broken,there was no reason for Arad &amp; co to try &amp; fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comparing SM3 to TF is ridiculous. if you kids are gonna compare Transformers to any Spiderfilm,make it a comparison to the original.</p>
<p>it was easy for Bay to get TF right as there was no previous live-action giant robot film to compare it to.<br />
let&#8217;s see how well a franchise TF is by the time it reaches installment number 3.</p>
<p>SM3 sucked a lot of ass to a lot of people due to the fact that it followed on from the bar-raising SM2. Batman Begins came close to touching that bar but not quite. we&#8217;ll see how Nolan does with the Dark Knight as his follow on before we make comparisons to Raimi&#8217;s first two SM outings.</p>
<p>personally i would rather Raimi move on from SM if he continues to get interference from the suits like he did on 3. there was to be no Gwen or Eddie had Raimi had HIS way. he did what he could under the circumstances. it&#8217;s no secret Raimi is a spiderfoe classicist.<br />
i heard nobody complaining about Doc Ock or the Green Goblin. or even about the awesome Sandman FX. if Sam&#8217;s way wasnt broken,there was no reason for Arad &#038; co to try &#038; fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonatan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57396</link>
		<dc:creator>yonatan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57396</guid>
		<description>fuck the hobbit, raimi should do spiderman 4 without anyone telling him what characters to put in. cough- avi arad -cough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck the hobbit, raimi should do spiderman 4 without anyone telling him what characters to put in. cough- avi arad -cough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/07/sam-raimi-meeting-with-sony-execs-about-spider-man-4#comment-57395</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=5334#comment-57395</guid>
		<description>John, I gotta ask you a question.  Yes, TF is great fun to watch with an audience.  Independence Day was as well, but then when I watched it by myself at home, it wasn&#039;t nearly as entertaining.  Do you think TF is gonna be one of those movies that is a fun experience in the theater, but a bit of a bummer when you watch it on DVD at home(with Doug crying over Lazerbeak)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I gotta ask you a question.  Yes, TF is great fun to watch with an audience.  Independence Day was as well, but then when I watched it by myself at home, it wasn&#8217;t nearly as entertaining.  Do you think TF is gonna be one of those movies that is a fun experience in the theater, but a bit of a bummer when you watch it on DVD at home(with Doug crying over Lazerbeak)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

