<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek the Fourth? &#8211; Prequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RiZE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-165357</link>
		<dc:creator>RiZE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-165357</guid>
		<description>Even if it was a gay man... thats hardly &quot;corruption&quot;

conservative much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if it was a gay man&#8230; thats hardly &#8220;corruption&#8221;</p>
<p>conservative much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63018</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63018</guid>
		<description>Shannon, I have to agree with Jarek here.  The &quot;Ugly stepsister&quot; stereotype was made more funny by making her SO ugly and giving her a man&#039;s voice.  There was nothing appealing about her.  Truly the loathsome ugly step sister of fairytale quality, just like all the other fairytale characters.

Furthermore, Bugs Bunny was cross dressing long before Shrek was even considered for a movie.  Just sayin.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon, I have to agree with Jarek here.  The &#8220;Ugly stepsister&#8221; stereotype was made more funny by making her SO ugly and giving her a man&#8217;s voice.  There was nothing appealing about her.  Truly the loathsome ugly step sister of fairytale quality, just like all the other fairytale characters.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Bugs Bunny was cross dressing long before Shrek was even considered for a movie.  Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarek</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63017</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re obviously (I&#039;m assuming) new to the series, Shannon. That character was one of the ugly stepsisters, not a man. It&#039;s a joke. It has nothing to do with homosexuality at all. It&#039;s just a very ugly (manly) woman that happens to have the voice of Larry King.

BTW, why did you take your kid to see this movie if you and he (I&#039;m assuming) haven&#039;t seen the other films? I&#039;m always curious to know why that happens...my friend who&#039;s a girl went and saw Clerks 2 and she had no idea what Clerks 1 was. Nor Jay and Silent Bob Strikes Back. Nor any of Kevin&#039;s other films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re obviously (I&#8217;m assuming) new to the series, Shannon. That character was one of the ugly stepsisters, not a man. It&#8217;s a joke. It has nothing to do with homosexuality at all. It&#8217;s just a very ugly (manly) woman that happens to have the voice of Larry King.</p>
<p>BTW, why did you take your kid to see this movie if you and he (I&#8217;m assuming) haven&#8217;t seen the other films? I&#8217;m always curious to know why that happens&#8230;my friend who&#8217;s a girl went and saw Clerks 2 and she had no idea what Clerks 1 was. Nor Jay and Silent Bob Strikes Back. Nor any of Kevin&#8217;s other films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Shumway</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63016</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Shumway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63016</guid>
		<description>I cant think f a character who Im less curious to see the origins of. A once great Jedi who turns to the darkside and is horribly scarred, yes. A troll  in a swamp, oh wow what interesting events caused this. Seriously its just going to be terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant think f a character who Im less curious to see the origins of. A once great Jedi who turns to the darkside and is horribly scarred, yes. A troll  in a swamp, oh wow what interesting events caused this. Seriously its just going to be terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63015</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63015</guid>
		<description>I took my son to see the movie over the weekend. My son loved it! I just had a very big problem of the way we portray homosexuality. It was not called for to have a man dressed as a woman. And my son question me why he had a mans voice. That was very disturbing!! As if we need to corrupt our kids anymore than they already are. This is a kids movie!!I understand we are living in a different day from when I grew up, but my goodness that was not called for at all!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took my son to see the movie over the weekend. My son loved it! I just had a very big problem of the way we portray homosexuality. It was not called for to have a man dressed as a woman. And my son question me why he had a mans voice. That was very disturbing!! As if we need to corrupt our kids anymore than they already are. This is a kids movie!!I understand we are living in a different day from when I grew up, but my goodness that was not called for at all!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkbhudda</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63014</link>
		<dc:creator>darkbhudda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 08:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63014</guid>
		<description>Why is it every time someone announces a sequel they always start talking about prequels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it every time someone announces a sequel they always start talking about prequels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren j Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63013</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren j Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63013</guid>
		<description>If the masses want Shrek 4, they will get Shrek 4.
But if they get &quot;this&quot;....

Yeah. I know the truth! See, Rodney, it goes like this....when there are characters like The Muppts, suddenly we get The Muppet Babies. We get childhood memories of Bugs Bunny and Wile E Coyote turned into shrunken versions of themselves...

So...we need BABY SHREK to sell plush toys to our kids, nieces and nephews!
Get with the program!

:)

Yeah, people only *wish* I&#039;m kidding.
Because that&#039;s the only reason for a prequel.
Unless the character is Puss N Boots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the masses want Shrek 4, they will get Shrek 4.<br />
But if they get &#8220;this&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yeah. I know the truth! See, Rodney, it goes like this&#8230;.when there are characters like The Muppts, suddenly we get The Muppet Babies. We get childhood memories of Bugs Bunny and Wile E Coyote turned into shrunken versions of themselves&#8230;</p>
<p>So&#8230;we need BABY SHREK to sell plush toys to our kids, nieces and nephews!<br />
Get with the program!</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Yeah, people only *wish* I&#8217;m kidding.<br />
Because that&#8217;s the only reason for a prequel.<br />
Unless the character is Puss N Boots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hall</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63012</link>
		<dc:creator>hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 05:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/05/shrek-the-fourth-prequel#comment-63012</guid>
		<description>i haven&#039;t seen Shrek 3 yet, but since Shrek 1 they had in mind 4 movies, and the fourth one (as you said) explains Shrek&#039;s origins and why he ended up in the swamp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i haven&#8217;t seen Shrek 3 yet, but since Shrek 1 they had in mind 4 movies, and the fourth one (as you said) explains Shrek&#8217;s origins and why he ended up in the swamp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

