Comments on: Batman the Dark Knight – Joker Pic Revealed

By: Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:29:58 +0000

oh yeah … and as for the picture above, looks nothing like what I saw. Maybe a “before” picture, but nothing like what i’ve seen …

By: Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:28:22 +0000

If anyone is curious to the looks of the Joker, there is a website I found that has a teaser trailer … He’s gonna be VERY wild looking and insane …. I can’t wait for the movie !! If anyone is interested just shoot me an email …

By: Gonzo

Gonzo — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:43:13 +0000

I think he loks great and the whole “page not found” thing is genius…

but seeing the page full of “HahaHHAhahaha” makes me wonder one thing, WHAT WILL HE SOUND LIKE??? What will the LAUGH sound like?

i can’t wait to find out

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:51:28 +0000

I still contest that a GOOD movie doesn’t mean its a big boxoffice draw. There have been LOTS of good movies that don’t break the top10 boxoffice records. Also, there have been a lot of big boxoffice records set by crappy movies.

And I also disagree that just because these are comic book based characters, that this cannot have an adult feel to them. Thats just bullshit. Adults read comics. I am one of them.

By: Poe

Poe — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:10:38 +0000

Huh??? So, in a baseball game, whichever team scores more runs in the third inning wins, even though that team has less runs for the entire game? Spidey 3 didn’t make as much money in week 3, but the totals show it kicked Begins and Returns’ asses. It’s the final score that counts, dude.

Boxoffice means EVERYTHING in charting how well a movie does, and how many people like it. Again, I say quality or whether a movie is good or awful is all relevent.

I don’t like this trend to make superhero movies adult-oriented, shutting out the kids. These are movies based on COMIC BOOKS, people! If you want an adult take on a hero, go to James Bond, Sherlock Holmes, or Philip Wylie’s Gladiator.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Mon, 28 May 2007 19:19:34 +0000

I have said it before and will repeat it again. Boxoffice means NOTHING to the quality of the movie. If more people liked Spidey3, then why did Batman Begins and Superman Returns make more money in week 3 than in week 3 of Spidey3? So much for that angle you were working with.

You cannot compare this Batman Franchise with its predecessor. Kids were not allowed to see Batman Begins because of its rating and that SERIOUSLY is going to hamper its box office sales. Not to say it wasn’t a good movie or is more liked.

Furthermore, I never said you HAD to like Batman Begins or Dark Knight. But it is in a style and direction you DONT like, so are you really surprised that a character concept is revealed that fits well with the direction Begins started with?

By: Poe

Poe — Mon, 28 May 2007 18:01:56 +0000

Rodney, “good” is relevent to the individual. There really is no such thing as a “good” movie or a “terrible” movie. As a kid, I loved the 1980 “Popeye” movie. To me it was a great movie. A lot of other people thought it was a bad movie. You like “Batman Begins”. It is a good movie…to you. I did not like it. It is a crap movie to me. The only way to truley judge a film is by how popular it is and how many people like it. The barometer for that is how much money it makes at the box office. Actually, I wish Hollywood would release the number of tickets sold for a film instead of just how much money it made. Going by number of tickets would be much more accurate. Needkess to say, Spidey 3 made way more money than “Batman Begins” or “Superman Returns” because more people liked Spidey 3…therefore it is a better film to many. “Begins” only made 200 mil…a huge disappointment by any standard (it couldn’t even break “Batman”‘s record in 1989 dollars…and if you adjust for inflation, “Begins” would rate 4th out of the 5 WB Bat films..only beating the hated “Batman & Robin”…another reason why going by number of tix sold would be a more accurate system-wouldn’t need to adjust for inflation…of course, then “Gone With The Wind” would still be the all time number one movie). Anyways, WB won’t get my money for “Brokeback Batman”. I think it’ll make 140 to 175 mil total. WB will need to reevaluate its Bat franchise once again.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sat, 26 May 2007 03:07:58 +0000

Poe, you seem already disenchanted with the gritty real edge Nolan gave this franchise, so it is unlikely that anything he does that fits that mould will satisfy you.

And Spiderman 3 was horrible. It had a DANCE NUMBER?!?!?! Suck.

Spiderman made the money because of hype. And because it was rated so kiddies can go see it too. Spiderman 1 & 2 also made more money than the original 4 Batmans (Two Burton, Two Schummacher) too. Or anything by Hamm.

Money might be the bottom line, but it is never the equation to a good film.

By: Poe

Poe — Fri, 25 May 2007 18:26:44 +0000

That’s not the Joker…that’s Ronald McDonald on crack! I disliked “Batman Begins”, and I think I’ll pass on “Brokeback Batman” (my nickname for this sequel). There is a reason why “Spider-Man 3″ made more money in three weeks than either “Batman Begins” or “Superman Returns” made in thier entire runs. Bring back Tim Burton and Sam Hamm!

By: #007#

#007# — Wed, 23 May 2007 04:42:11 +0000

Oh yeah I’m getting a wedgie for all the wrong reasons :) This is freaky…creepy looking. This is the only movie that gives me a hard on!!. Now don’t laugh.