<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rambo 4 Gets New Name: John Rambo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-131762</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-131762</guid>
		<description>The real reason that Odeon cinema in the UK banned Rambo 4 was because that the company is owned by CINVEN who also have massive oil and chemical interests in - Burma. Odeon tried to tell us that they decided not to screen this for &quot;commercial reasons&quot; - despite it grossing U.S. Box Office: $42,724,402 ? And since when did Odeon start censoring films? I smell a rat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason that Odeon cinema in the UK banned Rambo 4 was because that the company is owned by CINVEN who also have massive oil and chemical interests in &#8211; Burma. Odeon tried to tell us that they decided not to screen this for &#8220;commercial reasons&#8221; &#8211; despite it grossing U.S. Box Office: $42,724,402 ? And since when did Odeon start censoring films? I smell a rat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos A.</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74631</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74631</guid>
		<description>Stallone better be in better shape than in Rocky 6
I would expect him to be ripped but who knows
I dont care much for the title of this next one
I hope to see a lot of action from stallone 
And not so depressing like most of Rocky 6
&quot;if its not war.....Its got to become war!!!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stallone better be in better shape than in Rocky 6<br />
I would expect him to be ripped but who knows<br />
I dont care much for the title of this next one<br />
I hope to see a lot of action from stallone<br />
And not so depressing like most of Rocky 6<br />
&#8220;if its not war&#8230;..Its got to become war!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfie</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74630</link>
		<dc:creator>alfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74630</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind sequels not having a number. I like them to have their own individual title....
just like books....you rarely see a book call itself something or other part 2


James Bond 21 is a great example....that series probably would have died if it was just called James Bond 3-4-5 etc etc as it would just sound tired to people....

lets face it....no one referred to empire strikes back at the time as episode 5.....it may have beenon the opening scroll but it wasn&#039;t on the posters that stuff only came in with the prequels...
it was &quot;the empire strikes back&quot;...

star wars part 2 is nowhere near as cool sounding.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind sequels not having a number. I like them to have their own individual title&#8230;.<br />
just like books&#8230;.you rarely see a book call itself something or other part 2</p>
<p>James Bond 21 is a great example&#8230;.that series probably would have died if it was just called James Bond 3-4-5 etc etc as it would just sound tired to people&#8230;.</p>
<p>lets face it&#8230;.no one referred to empire strikes back at the time as episode 5&#8230;..it may have beenon the opening scroll but it wasn&#8217;t on the posters that stuff only came in with the prequels&#8230;<br />
it was &#8220;the empire strikes back&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>star wars part 2 is nowhere near as cool sounding&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74629</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74629</guid>
		<description>John have you perhaps seen Chronologically Confused about Movie and Video Game Sequels by &quot;The Angry Video Game Nerd&quot; on YouTube? If not check it out - http://youtube.com/watch?v=OEVzPCY2T-g it&#039;s pretty hilarious and describe exactly what you angry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John have you perhaps seen Chronologically Confused about Movie and Video Game Sequels by &#8220;The Angry Video Game Nerd&#8221; on YouTube? If not check it out &#8211; <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=OEVzPCY2T-g" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=OEVzPCY2T-g</a> it&#8217;s pretty hilarious and describe exactly what you angry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darren j seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74628</link>
		<dc:creator>darren j seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74628</guid>
		<description>I want &quot;Marion Cobretti!&quot;

hahahahahahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want &#8220;Marion Cobretti!&#8221;</p>
<p>hahahahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wormwood</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74627</link>
		<dc:creator>Wormwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74627</guid>
		<description>I was going to send you the article on this...

The Associated Press about a week ago made mention that sequels are given names rather than numerically numbered due to studio stats showing that &quot;named&quot; movies have proven to be more readily accepted and received rather than the same movie title only with &quot;Part [whatever]&quot; after it.  

I&#039;d tend to agree.  &#039;James Bond Part 21&#039; isn&#039;t a very interesting title, and sounds very tired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to send you the article on this&#8230;</p>
<p>The Associated Press about a week ago made mention that sequels are given names rather than numerically numbered due to studio stats showing that &#8220;named&#8221; movies have proven to be more readily accepted and received rather than the same movie title only with &#8220;Part [whatever]&#8221; after it.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d tend to agree.  &#8216;James Bond Part 21&#8242; isn&#8217;t a very interesting title, and sounds very tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74626</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what to think about him calling it John Rambo but to call it Rocky Balboa was in my opinion the PERFECT choice.

The title Rocky Balboa says what it does on the tin.  Its a little bit classier and you know its really gonna be back to his best like the first film.  

Its just going full circle really, I mean they didn&#039;t call the first one Rocky 1 and apparently Stallone wasn&#039;t too happy with Rocky 5 so maybe he wanted Rocky Balboa NOT to include the 6 so as to forget the 5th story...damn that sounded better in my head than on the screen.

Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think about him calling it John Rambo but to call it Rocky Balboa was in my opinion the PERFECT choice.</p>
<p>The title Rocky Balboa says what it does on the tin.  Its a little bit classier and you know its really gonna be back to his best like the first film.  </p>
<p>Its just going full circle really, I mean they didn&#8217;t call the first one Rocky 1 and apparently Stallone wasn&#8217;t too happy with Rocky 5 so maybe he wanted Rocky Balboa NOT to include the 6 so as to forget the 5th story&#8230;damn that sounded better in my head than on the screen.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74625</link>
		<dc:creator>louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74625</guid>
		<description>richard wilkins and channel 9 are hardly a reliable source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard wilkins and channel 9 are hardly a reliable source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74624</guid>
		<description>Yeah,
but think about how this series has been named so far.

First Blood
Rambo: First Blood part 2
Rambo 3... what?!?

It already doesnt make any sense.
Why wasnt it first Blood part 3? Why wasnt it Rambo 2: First Blood part 3? We never had a Rambo 2, how can we have a Rambo 3? The naming process of this series has already been messed up. I realize that the appropriate numbers are there but the titling is already wacky. 
I think John Rambo is a fine title. He wants to give both the characters a proper goodbye, so I think it makes sense to name them the same way.
I doubted him with Rocky Balboa and I was proven very wrong. I&#039;m not gonna make the same mistake again.
I&#039;m looking forward to this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,<br />
but think about how this series has been named so far.</p>
<p>First Blood<br />
Rambo: First Blood part 2<br />
Rambo 3&#8230; what?!?</p>
<p>It already doesnt make any sense.<br />
Why wasnt it first Blood part 3? Why wasnt it Rambo 2: First Blood part 3? We never had a Rambo 2, how can we have a Rambo 3? The naming process of this series has already been messed up. I realize that the appropriate numbers are there but the titling is already wacky.<br />
I think John Rambo is a fine title. He wants to give both the characters a proper goodbye, so I think it makes sense to name them the same way.<br />
I doubted him with Rocky Balboa and I was proven very wrong. I&#8217;m not gonna make the same mistake again.<br />
I&#8217;m looking forward to this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kneon Transitt</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74623</link>
		<dc:creator>Kneon Transitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/02/rambo-4-gets-new-name-john-rambo#comment-74623</guid>
		<description>I still want John Spartan, aka Demolition Man 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still want John Spartan, aka Demolition Man 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

