Why are you here? Don’t get me wrong… you have every right to be. But if you look down your nose at the entertainment industry, why spend time on a blog that focuses on it?

After I saw a better picture of that hair cut, i admit that you’re right. from the picture on your post, it didn’t look that bad. so i jumped to attack your character.

the hair cut is pretty goddamn bad. i admit i’m wrong and that i’m a hypocrite.

pet‧ty 
1. of little or no importance or consequence: petty grievances.
2. of lesser or secondary importance, merit, etc.; minor: petty considerations.
3. having or showing narrow ideas, interests, etc.: petty minds.
4. mean or ungenerous in small or trifling things: a petty person.
5. showing or caused by meanness of spirit: a petty revenge.
6. of secondary rank, esp. in relation to others of the same class or kind: petty states; a petty tyrant.

take which ever defintion you want. i still stand by my point about this post.

I don’t think John was out of line. When talented actors who can afford things, even in moderation, items that can help in appearance or personal hygine, you have to wonder.
Concerning Dawson, I do think this is for a film role myself, or at least that’s what I hope.

But the real reason while I’m responding again? Your shallow comments. I don’t think John “worships” Hollywood as much as I do, and I’m still a born again Christian. Even a Christian can look at Dawson’s picture and say “Bad Hair Day”. Also, not “every” movie is anti-religion. There are not even a few exceptions, there are several.

And Christianity, last time I checked, has nothing against beauty or wealth. It’s how people choose to use it or abuse it.